article thumbnail

Workplace Trends from 2004…Still Trending

Integrated Learnings

One dusty cover that caught my eye was the January 2004 issue of Training + Development Magazine from ASTD, with this headline: 8 Trends You Need to Know NOW. Here’s a peek at the eight trends from 2004. --1-- It seems like the workplace trends and advice for practioners from ASTD’s 2004 article still apply. Show them the value.

Trends 123
article thumbnail

SCORM Vs. xAPI (Tin Can): eLearning Content Standards

Academy of Mine

SCORM 2004 (four editions) Each version is different and offers more flexibility in eLearning for both administrators and learners. and the latest version of 2004 (the most popular protocols). xAPI is an eLearning content standard that was developed in 2013, and it was designed as a more advanced version of SCORM 2004.

xapi 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why SCORM 2004 failed & what that means for Tin Can

eFront

“SCORM 2004 is dying (if not already dead!).” 10 years after the initial release of SCORM 2004 [1] [2]. Sign #2: There is no certification process for tools and packages for the latest SCORM 2004 4 th edition. Sign #2: There is no certification process for tools and packages for the latest SCORM 2004 4 th edition.

SCORM 105
article thumbnail

Why SCORM compliance is absolutely essential for any best-in-class LMS

Docebo

Why SCORM compliance is absolutely essential for competitive, market-leading LMS performance and effectiveness. The most recent version, SCORM 2004, provides three major advantages over previous versions: It allows the instructor to see if a learner completed a course before awarding a pass/fail grade. Docebo is SCORM 1.2

SCORM 130
article thumbnail

Agile Microlearning Explained

Learner engagement and retention doesn’t have to be a mystery. Cognitive science theories already supply the answers. Learn how OttoLearn packages them into a single platform you can use to deliver microlearning based reinforcement training, and go beyond completions to focus on outcomes.

article thumbnail

Let’s get rid of the instructional designers!

E-Learning Provocateur

Carr-Chellman & Savoy (2004) provide a broad overview of user design. According to Carr-Chellman & Savoy (2004), traditional instructional design methodologies disenfranchise the user from the design process. Definition. Comparison against other methodologies. User-centered design. Further Research.

article thumbnail

Canaries in the Coal Mine: Instructional Design in the Age of AI

Learningtogo

While we’ve been writing about getting “ a seat at the table ” since at least 2004, it seems that the learning profession continues to be seen by many as a useful – and highly expendable – little canary. Are You a Canary or a Miner? The Choice is Yours It’s important to note that AI is not replacing all instructional designers just yet.