Clark Quinn

article thumbnail

Assessing online assessments

Clark Quinn

Writing good assessments is hard. Extensions that are high value include problem generators and randomness in the order of options (challenging attempts to ‘game’ the assessment). A greater variety of response options for novelty isn’t bad either, and automarking is desirable for at least a subset of assessment.

article thumbnail

Flipping assessment

Clark Quinn

Inspired by Dave Cormier’s learning contract , and previous work at learner-defined syllabi and assessment, I had a thought about learner-created project evaluation rubrics. This is part of good design; you should be developing your assessment criteria as part of the analysis phase, e.g. before you start specifying a solution.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Solutions for Tight Cycles of Assessment

Clark Quinn

As a consequence, you want regular cycles of assessment. How do we reconcile meaningful assessment with realistic constraints? In workplace learning, at times we can get by with auto-assessment, particularly if we use coaching beyond the learning event. However, there’s a conflict.

article thumbnail

Revolution Roadmap: Assess

Clark Quinn

The first step is Assess, and I’ve been thinking about what that means. So, are you ready to take the first step to assess where you are? Last week, I wrote about a process to follow in moving forward on the L&D Revolution. So here, let me lay out some preliminary thoughts. The first level are the broad categories.

article thumbnail

A bad question

Clark Quinn

Is it just a video, with no assessment? Of course, if the ‘-based’ means assessment as well, how is that separate from ‘interactive quizzes’? Then, the options lack full definitions. What do they mean by ‘video-based learning’? Is it really ‘learning’ then? Similarly for articles.

article thumbnail

Time is the biggest problem?

Clark Quinn

BTW, the correlation for learner assessment of learning quality, and the actual quality, is essentially zero.) If we’re just asking people whether they like it, we don’t really know if it’s working. There’s no basis to iterate!

Problem 309
article thumbnail

Levels of LXD Design

Clark Quinn

At the next level, I’ll suggest that the performance objectives drive assessment specifications, and the other decision at this level is for the pedagogical approach. We need to know what learners need to able to do, and how we’ll get them there.

Design 183