Good To Great

FEBRUARY 5, 2013

Ultimately the paper is a rejection of technological determinism, with the author describing the theory as ‘reductive’ and technocentric. I haven’t done enough supplementary reading to feel well-informed about the theory and criticisms of it. Certainly this is reductionist, in Chandler’s terms.

Theory 47

Theory Technology Articulate Social 47

Good To Great

FEBRUARY 5, 2013

Ultimately the paper is a rejection of technological determinism, with the author describing the theory as ‘reductive’ and technocentric. I haven’t done enough supplementary reading to feel well-informed about the theory and criticisms of it. Certainly this is reductionist, in Chandler’s terms.

Theory 44

Theory Technology Articulate Social 44

Good To Great

FEBRUARY 3, 2012

We’ve all heard that ‘opposites attract’ and this applies to archetypes too – opposite archetypes often have common connections, for example in what drives them or their perception of time: The Sovereign works well with the Mystic, because both are driven by power and both tend to look ahead. ’ about it all.

Brain 53

Brain Performance Support Performance Association 53

Good To Great

FEBRUARY 3, 2012

We’ve all heard that ‘opposites attract’ and this applies to archetypes too – opposite archetypes often have common connections, for example in what drives them or their perception of time: The Sovereign works well with the Mystic, because both are driven by power and both tend to look ahead. ’ about it all.

Brain 40

Brain Performance Support Performance Association 40

Good To Great

FEBRUARY 27, 2013

His take on the problem is, I think, that we devote too much energy to teaching students the technicalities of how to use technology: how to use various software to speed up calculations or processes; how to use the internet to research topics. What’s interesting to me, though, is that it’s about more than voices or faces.

Diversity Training 47

Diversity Training Voice Virtual World Teach 47