Clive on Learning

article thumbnail

Insights: Evaluation and follow-up matters

Clive on Learning

The tenth and final 'insight' is that ‘Evaluation and follow-up matters'. Successful learning departments are preparing a business case for projects and then evaluating the impact on performance. This post completes my commentary to the Learning Insights 2012 Report produced by Kineo for e.learning age magazine.

article thumbnail

Epic evaluation shows the value of preparing students for study

Clive on Learning

Brighton-based e-learning developer Epic and the University of Birmingham have used good old Donald Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation to demonstrate the worth of their Skills4uni study skills programme. Skills4uni "gives prospective students an idea of what to expect from their degree programme and university life in general.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning

Clive on Learning

I came across this study courtesy of Donald Clark who reviewed it back in early September. It reports on a meta-analysis of more than 1000 studies of online learning conducted between 1996 and 2008, focusing in on those which contrasted online learning with face-to-face instruction. It was published by the US Department of Education in May.

article thumbnail

Knowing where to look is more valuable than knowing what

Clive on Learning

Siemens explains how: "Instead of the individual having to evaluate and process every bit of information, she/he creates a personal network of trusted nodes: people and content, enhanced by technology. These findings back up the concept of connectivism, as described by George Siemens in Knowing Knowledge ( see my 2006 review ).

Network 93
article thumbnail

What's the problem with Kirkpatrick?

Clive on Learning

The aim of the session aim was to 'present a fresh perspective on evaluation', based on work carried out for the CIPD by the University of Portsmouth. It's worth checking first of all whether Kirkpatrick's model is still useful for evaluating the top-down stuff. Surely what's needed is a combination of the two.

article thumbnail

What's the point in competency frameworks?

Clive on Learning

For: Evaluating someone’s performance on the basis of what they can actually do is a whole lot better than judging them by their personal qualities, their qualifications, the amount of time they spend on an activity or even their knowledge. Assessing competencies against a portfolio of evidence is cumbersome and time-consuming.

article thumbnail

D is also for debunking

Clive on Learning

In post ID, Why Managers Mater , I shared the results of an evaluation study carried out by KnowledgePool, in which 10,000 employees and their managers were asked to assess the degree to which they had been able to apply what they had learned on a course completed three months earlier and the impact this had had on their performance.