|
•
Monday, February 9, 2009
Well, recently a clear and provocative pattern has emerged regarding the intersection of Microsoft SharePoint and the Learning Management System (LMS). in SharePoint without having to enter the LMS environment? Of the ~40 companies in our latest LMS Industry Study (publishing soon!) Tags: LMS Has anyone (e.g,
|
|
•
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Since 2001, Microsoft has sold well over 100 million licenses of SharePoint generating more than $1 billion / year in revenue. Enter SharePoint 2010, due to release in Q2 of 2010. 1) Learning Management System (LMS) Federation. SharePoint 2010 has better 2.0 3) Content, Collateral and Community. . rigour.
|
|
|
|
•
Monday, February 9, 2009
Well, recently a clear and provocative pattern has emerged regarding the intersection of Microsoft SharePoint and the Learning Management System (LMS). in SharePoint without having to enter the LMS environment? Of the ~40 companies in our latest LMS Industry Study (publishing soon!) Tags: LMS Has anyone (e.g,
|
|
•
Monday, February 9, 2009
Well, recently a clear and provocative pattern has emerged regarding the intersection of Microsoft SharePoint and the Learning Management System (LMS). in SharePoint without having to enter the LMS environment? Of the ~40 companies in our latest LMS Industry Study (publishing soon!) Tags: LMS Has anyone (e.g,
|
|
•
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
If you’ve been reading the posts here at aLearning about LMSes, you might have notived that one of the systems I haven’t discussed yet is Sharepoint. So when I discovered that our server upgrade included use of Sharepoint “for free&# I was thrilled. There was no added value in using Sharepoint for the staff.
|
|
|
|
•
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
constantly hear people (across many organizations) complain about their learning management system (LMS). They complain that their LMS has a terrible interface that is nearly unusable. don’t really understand why LMS vendors are now thinking they need to build in every possible 2.0 Upgrades are difficult and cumbersome.
|
|
•
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Dave Wilkins , who I admire, has taken up the argument for the LMS in a long post , after a suite of posts (including mine ). earlier made two points: one is that the LMS can be valuable if it has all the features. Or if you need the LMS features as part of a larger federated suite. And if you want an integrated suite.
|
|
•
Saturday, October 24, 2009
This past week, I attended the SharePoint 2009 conference in Las Vegas. I’ll provide some feedback on that particular release in another blog posting (read Bill Simser for now) but what the conference itself got me thinking about was that, thankfully, the standalone LMS is definitely going to become redundant. Blow up your LMS.
|
|
|
|
•
Sunday, April 25, 2010
That said… Here are a few more LMS and LCMS options to consider: Nancy Safer [nancy@edcetratraining.com] at edCetra Training tells me they have a “mini&# LMS as part of their edXact! in June with major design enhancements to be compatible with SharePoint 2010. And the emails just keep coming in! Easy peasy.
|
|
•
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Last year, I wrote a piece entitled “ The Standalone LMS is Dead ”. Last week, Dave Wilkins of Learn.com wrote a piece entitled “ A Defense of the LMS (and a case for the future of social learning) ”. He believes the LMS is alive and kicking. The LMS should not be a standalone application going into the future. Period.
|
