Vikas Joshi on Interactive Learning

FEBRUARY 15, 2012

They face a lot of cost pressure on eLearning programs. From the Producer’s standpoint – we have to focus on reducing the cost of producing eLearning programs and increase the level of interactivity and graphic rich content. Especially important from supplier’s viewpoint is the decrease in cost for per hour of eLearning development.

Change 161

Change AICC Low Cost eLearning Tools 161

Infopro Learning

JUNE 13, 2022

The best part is that they are low costing hence you won’t have to compromise with your budget. It should be XAPI/ SCORM/ AICC compliant. It is designed to help users find an appropriate layout compatible with their course. These tools make the content more interactive. Plus, it also saves a considerable amount of your time.

Content Developer 221

Content Developer Compliance Training Content eLearning Strategy 221

From the Coleface

AUGUST 28, 2007

But probably the only way they can be differentiated from each other is in terms of ease of use (time to mastery and time to build) and cost. Adherence to SCORM specification and AICC standard. Low cost (for stand alone authoring tools). There is a vast array of different e-learning authoring tools on the market.

Authoring 100

Authoring Search Brandon Hall Tools 100

eFront

MARCH 29, 2013

2004, AICC, Tin Can (Lectora 11 onwards) and XML. Xerte – This open source – and, thus, low cost – authoring tool from the University of Nottingham is gaining popularity among further and higher education establishments. Lectora will publish both Flash and HTML5 for Apps and rendering through iPads and smartphones.

Flash to HTML5 Conversion 100

Flash to HTML5 Conversion Interactive Raptivity Lectora 100

Petra Mayer

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Cloud-based LMS is quicker and cost-effective to install compared to self-hosted learning solutions. Several eLearning standards, including SCORM, xAPI (Tin Can) and AICC, help enhance the interoperability of online learning content and technologies. Despite the low cost and flexibility, Moodle is quite costly to maintain and adapt.

Authoring Tools 52

Authoring Tools Blended Learning Develop LMS 52

eLearning 24-7

DECEMBER 20, 2011

Costs and quality will vary. For vendors creating standalone apps for the masses on a variety of offerings or new product lines, costs will need to be significantly lower, otherwise it will not be successful. Costs will vary, again lower price points are needed. who do not have the inside staff to build such an app.

Blended Learning 94

Blended Learning Authoring Tools Augmented Reality vendor 94

LearnUpon

JULY 14, 2016

Companies should be wary of the value a “free” learning platform can deliver and alert to the costs quickly accrued in maintaining, updating and supporting an LMS without a vendor. Despite its low cost and flexibility, Moodle’s weaknesses can make it a costly choice for companies with conflicting needs and requirements.

Authoring Tools 40

Authoring Tools Blended Learning White Label SCORM 40