How do we measure value creation from training?

Learning Wire

In a previous article we looked at the five levels of impact in any exhaustive training evaluation process that reflect the key challenges involved in high-quality evaluation. In this second article, we’ll be looking at the different aspects of training evaluation represented in diagram form, the three key principles that will help you to evaluate effectively, and a few tips to avoid the issue of intangibles. Phillips J, Pulliam Phillips P.

Evaluating Training Effectiveness and ROI

Geenio

How to convince one’s manager that it is worthwhile (and profitable) to continue the training program and expand it to include other departments if you have no data to profit cost ratio to back you up? You can read about these levels in-depth in my previous article, Getting to Know ADDIE: Evaluation. In this article, I would like to focus on the fifth level, which was suggested for addition by Jack Phillips.

ROI 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Weighing the Options: Different Schools of Thought

CLO Magazine

The longtime University of Wisconsin at Madison professor wrote a series of articles in 1959 for the American Society for Training and Development that outlined what became known as the four levels of evaluation — reaction, learning, behavior and results. Jack Phillips, chairman of ROI Institute Inc., Phillips, who started the ROI Institute in 1993 and has written a number of books on the subject, adds a fifth level, return on investment, to the taxonomy.

Is this thing on? Tips for measuring course effectiveness and return on investment

Obsidian Learning

We’ll cover QC in depth in another blog article, but here’s a summary of what to do: Storyboard/Content Validation: Test all course content for instructional effectiveness, grammatical accuracy, and stylistic clarity. To determine the financial benefit of your course, you need to identify both hard data elements and soft data elements (Phillips, 1996): Hard data elements are benefits to which monetary amounts may be assigned. With a cost-benefit ratio of 2.14, you can expect $2.14