What Are Your Training Metrics Actually Measuring?

Your Training Edge

Much has been written on the subject and many experts have weighed in on what they consider to be the most crucial training metrics ( here are my top 10 ). So, assuming that you are tracking some metrics for your training programs, what are they actually measuring and how can you gain more insight into what’s working and what’s not? Still others have argued for separating behavior metrics from performance metrics, and other modifications. Is your training working?

Metrics for Measuring Training Effectiveness

KnowledgeCity

There is a lot of buzz about metrics when it comes to e-learning, but do you understand what metrics are in relation to your training program? Metrics are quantifiable measures to track, monitor and assess whether your employees have learned and can apply the knowledge acquired through these e-learning opportunities. That’s why it is critical to have metrics in place whenever you provide e-learning opportunities for your workers.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision

Dashe & Thomson

I was asked by Wendy Kirkpatrick to remove the copyrighted Kirkpatrick diagrammatic model from my original blog post, How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century. Kirkpatrick’s Revised “Four Levels of Evaluation” model , what we need to do is find out what success looks like in the eyes of these senior managers and stakeholders and let them define their expectations for the training program. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE.

Kirkpatrick Revisited | Social Learning Blog

Dashe & Thomson

Social Learning Blog Training and Performance Improvement in the Real World Home About Bios Subscribe to RSS Kirkpatrick Revisited by Barbara on April 18, 2011 in Instructional Design After I finished my post a few weeks ago on Reevaluating Evaluation , I found out that Donald Kirkpatrick , the granddaddy of the Four Levels of Evaluation, was taking a farewell tour before his retirement and would be presenting a workshop at the American Society of Training and Development (ASTD) in Minneapolis.

How to Evaluate Learning: The Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century

Dashe & Thomson

Even though many Learning and Development organizations find it a challenge to prove training’s effect beyond how learners react to the training and whether they have learned the training content, senior management and business stakeholders are more and more interested in metrics that show the impact on the organization. Then we need to identify specific metrics to demonstrate and deliver on those expectations. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE.

How to Measure Online Course Effectiveness

CourseArc

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Approach to Assessing Training Outcomes. In his well-known book Four Levels of Training Evaluation , industry expert Donald Kirkpatrick established a trusted method to help training developers and HR specialists measure the effectiveness of their training initiatives. Has this training improved their skills, confidence and attitudes?

Measuring Success (ROI) of a Training MOOC, Part 1

Your Training Edge

The first metric to be considered was the number of students completing the courses with passing grades (usually defined as 70 percent or better). Depending how you look at it, this metric leads to either an excellent or a terrible conclusion. The most widely used (at least in theory) method of evaluating training programs is the four-level model developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. Learning – The new knowledge, skills, and attitudes gained from the course.

ROI 118

It’s Time to Rethink the Value of Training and Development

CLO Magazine

Many rely on the Kirkpatrick Model , which offers four levels of evaluation: Level 1: Reaction – The degree to which employees find the training favorable, engaging and relevant to their jobs. Level 2: Learning – The degree to which employees acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and commitment based on their training participation. That data can then be leveraged by correlating with metrics that are monitored anyway, such as performance and potential.

Measuring Success (ROI) of a Training MOOC, Part 2

Your Training Edge

In the previous post, I outlined the four-level model of evaluation developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. For learners and organizations, this is the most important individual level of measurement—the ability of learners to apply the new knowledge, skills, and attitudes they acquire in courses to their work. This practice blurs the line between “training” and “work” and allows employees to put their newly acquired knowledge, skills, and attitudes directly into practice.

ROI 109

Is this thing on? Tips for measuring course effectiveness and return on investment

Obsidian Learning

The Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The most commonly used method of accomplishing this is Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2006) compare it to measuring customer satisfaction and note that when learners are satisfied with training, they are more motivated to learn. The historical support metrics will be analyzed to determine support call trends before and after training. Kirkpatrick, D.

The Essential Guide to Learning Analytics in the Age of Big Data

Lambda Solutions

What metrics and sources to use in implementing learning analytics. This data can be sorted, filtered, and correlated to specific metrics, such as activity and course completions. The Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model is the gold standard for assessing online training programs.

Measuring The Effectiveness of Your Blended Learning Program

Obsidian Learning

You are likely familiar with Kirkpatrick’s model 1 of the 4 levels of evaluation: The higher you go up the levels, the more time and resources required, but the better the information you obtain. These metrics are helpful for making the case for learning, but are insufficient to argue for the value of learning to the organization. Your metrics will be tied to your learning objectives. Sometimes, the goal of training is the attitude change.

Best practices on measuring the impact of organizational learning

Matrix

The Kirkpatrick model still stands as a beacon in this sea of continuous renewal but there is the poignant need for a different approach to measuring everything from engagement to impact of training programs. These will quantify impact by targeting specific attitudes and behaviors and quantifying the extent to which they are changed or altered. Learning measurement is one of those topics that constantly seems to need revisiting.

Weighing the Options: Different Schools of Thought

CLO Magazine

The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. Kirkpatrick is now retired and the honorary chairman of Kirkpatrick Partners LLC, a learning and evaluation consultancy led by his son, James, and his daughter-in-law, Wendy.