Remove Content Remove Quality Remove Questionmark Remove vendor
article thumbnail

WORSTs E-Learning 2017 Awards

eLearning 24-7

Because it was bad and continues to be, at least with vendors and I have seen it with everyday consumers too. . A couple of weeks ago, a vendor in the micro-learning content space sent me a newsletter, where – wait for it. The spin that this was a new learning concept for successful content was erroneous.

Oracle 0
article thumbnail

State of the E-Learning Industry 2017

eLearning 24-7

Rapid content authoring tools (build courses – you build them). Assessment tools including Online Testing Tools (even online proctoring) (ProProfs, ClassMarker, Questionmark). Custom course/content shops (lots of them out there). Analyticals and reporting (quality and quantity). Most folks are aware of.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Turn Training into a Profit Center – Here’s How

eLearning 24-7

Charge for online courses – An obvious one, and the one most follow – but what they forget is the idea that it is a one-off and thus, if you want to them to return, and upsell to do so, it’s a mixed bag – it comes down to the quality, which many in the B2B/B2C space tend to ignore. . A package can do wonders. .

article thumbnail

Learning Tools – Do these really belong?

eLearning 24-7

And if we are going to talk about social media, why aren’t there any vendors from countries such as China? As you can see, the list has many quality learning tech products, but it has a lot that is really not learning technology tools, let alone platforms. Questionmark – Assessment tool. Qzone – 970M users.