Alternative to the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation

LearnDash

If you have been in the elearning (or training) industry for any amount of time, then you are most likely aware of the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation. For many of us in this industry, it is the go-to methodology for gathering training related metrics and reporting on training success. One could write an entire book on the Kirkpatrick model and the different levels, but I am not going to get into too much detail. Kaufman’s 5 Levels of Evaluation.

What Are Your Training Metrics Actually Measuring?

Your Training Edge

Much has been written on the subject and many experts have weighed in on what they consider to be the most crucial training metrics ( here are my top 10 ). He found a host of reasons why training is hard to evaluate: Training lacks planning, sponsorship, or budget. And finally, the methods generally used to measure and evaluate training are “antiquated.”. Still others have argued for separating behavior metrics from performance metrics, and other modifications.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision

Dashe & Thomson

I was asked by Wendy Kirkpatrick to remove the copyrighted Kirkpatrick diagrammatic model from my original blog post, How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century. Kirkpatrick’s Revised “Four Levels of Evaluation” model , what we need to do is find out what success looks like in the eyes of these senior managers and stakeholders and let them define their expectations for the training program.

Metrics for Measuring Training Effectiveness

KnowledgeCity

There is a lot of buzz about metrics when it comes to e-learning, but do you understand what metrics are in relation to your training program? Metrics are quantifiable measures to track, monitor and assess whether your employees have learned and can apply the knowledge acquired through these e-learning opportunities. That’s why it is critical to have metrics in place whenever you provide e-learning opportunities for your workers.

Training metrics you should include in your learning analytics report

Wizcabin

For every organization, it is highly essential to generate and evaluate training reports from learning analytics either for effective employee training or to determine the ROI of training programs or both. Training metrics to measure the effectiveness of your training.

Social Media Metrics

Clark Quinn

I continue to get asked about social learning metrics. Until we get around to a whitepaper or something on metrics, here’re some thoughts: Frankly, the problem with Kirkpatrick (sort of like with LMS’ and ADDIE, *drink*) is not in the concept, but in the execution. Frankly, even activity is a metric. You could couple that with subjective evaluation of value, but overall I would like to argue for more meaningful outcomes.

Training Evaluation Beyond Kirkpatrick

Training Industry

Because showing the return on investment from training involves many components and metrics that are not readily measurable, such as the behavioral changes in the learner’s day-to-day work as a result of the training they attended. Today, when we discuss training evaluation, we likely reference Kirkpatrick’s model with the familiar four levels: reaction, learning, behavior and results.

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the Question (or is it?)

Learning Rebels

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the question. Many a person has debated the Kirkpatrick evaluation taxonomy. To name a few: Dan Pontefract: Dear Kirkpatrick’s: You Still Don’t Get It (a personal favorite). Jane Bozarth: Alternatives to Kirkpatrick . Roger Chevalier, CPT: Evaluation, The Link Between Learning and Performance . Here we go again.

Kirkpatrick Revisited | Social Learning Blog

Dashe & Thomson

Social Learning Blog Training and Performance Improvement in the Real World Home About Bios Subscribe to RSS Kirkpatrick Revisited by Barbara on April 18, 2011 in Instructional Design After I finished my post a few weeks ago on Reevaluating Evaluation , I found out that Donald Kirkpatrick , the granddaddy of the Four Levels of Evaluation, was taking a farewell tour before his retirement and would be presenting a workshop at the American Society of Training and Development (ASTD) in Minneapolis.

How to Evaluate Learning: The Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century

Dashe & Thomson

Recent research by ASTD and REED Learning indicates that the top skills desired by Learning & Development departments are measuring and evaluating training. Even though many Learning and Development organizations find it a challenge to prove training’s effect beyond how learners react to the training and whether they have learned the training content, senior management and business stakeholders are more and more interested in metrics that show the impact on the organization.

Evaluating Social Learning

Dashe & Thomson

There are people looking at applying the Kirkpatrick model, there are people measuring the use of social learning tools, and there are people talking about something similar to Brinkerhoff’s Success Case Method. In the spirit of my blog posts on Re-evaluating Evaluation and Revisiting Kirkpatrick , I decided to start with Don Clark ?Big and his take on using Kirkpatrick’s four levels to create and evaluate social learning.

More on Re-evaluating Evaluation – Jack Phillips and ROI

Dashe & Thomson

I have been blogging a lot about Training Evaluation this year—mostly Kirkpatrick , but also Brinkerhoff and Scriven. I just realized that I haven’t included a single word about Jack Phillips , who introduced Return on Investment (ROI) as Level 5 to Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation. My first exposure to Phillips’ ROI—although I didn’t realize it at the time—was through a colleague who introduced me to Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels.

Training Evaluation – 5 Best Ways to Evaluate Training Effectiveness and Impact

Kitaboo

Training evaluation refers to an attempt to obtain relevant information on the effects of a training program. The primary objective of evaluating any training program is to develop an understanding of whether it has achieved its stated objectives. The Kirkpatrick Taxonomy Model.

ROI and Metrics in eLearning

Tony Karrer

I'm working on an article around the use of ROI and metrics in eLearning. Kirkpatrick's Level 3: Improving the Evaluation of E-Learning Level 3 evaluations measure whether the there was an actual transfer of learning to the actual work setting. This level of evaluation will increase the visibility of learning and development efforts, because successful implementation of Level 3 evaluation Internet Time Blog: ROI is toast.

Proven Post Training Evaluation Tips

LearnDash

One of the often over-looked components of training program development is the post-training evaluation. In many cases, the evaluation design is an afterthought as precedence is given to the actual training content. Arguably, the design of your evaluations should begin near the start of the entire project. This includes pre-course, in-course, and post-course evaluations. Even in a live training session, look to deliver the evaluation electronically.

Banishing Evaluation Fears

CLO Magazine

Eighty percent of training professionals believe that evaluating training results is important to their organization, according to the Association for Talent Development’s 2016 research report “Evaluating Learning: Getting to Measurements That Matter.” However, only 35 percent are confident that their training evaluation efforts meet organizational business goals. Lack of discipline in evaluation is most often seen in corporations.

50 Years of the Kirkpatrick Model

Upside Learning

In the fifty years since, his thoughts (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) have gone on to evolve into the legendary Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Evaluation Model and become the basis on which learning & development departments can show the value of training to the business. In November 1959, Donald Kirkpatrick published a series of seminal articles on training evaluation in the ‘Journal of the ASTD’.

Special Report 2013: Metrics and Measurement

CLO Magazine

Learning evaluation, metrics and measurement are not where they need to be, but some companies have made progress. Learning evaluation, metrics and measurement are not where they need to be, but some companies have made progress. The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. Putting Thought to Work: Evaluation in Practice.

Using Metrics That Matter

eLearning Weekly

instructor-led classes and online courses), there are two main types of metrics: transactional data and user data. This is where we get into Kirkpatrick’s levels of evaluation , the Success Case Evaluation Method (PDF) , and other classification systems. It records the evaluation data and then it gives you several ways to slice, dice, benchmark, and review the data once it is in the system. The person fills out the evaluation.

MTA: Why the Kirkpatrick Model Works for Us

CLO Magazine

As he settled into his new job, Wiedecker read Jim and Wendy Kirkpatrick’s book, “Training on Trial,” which inspired him to implement the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model at the MTA. The four levels of training evaluation Don Kirkpatrick put forth first in the 1950s are well known to learning leaders. Sixty percent evaluate Level 3: behavior — how participants apply training on the job. Implementing the Kirkpatrick Model.

Avoid and Correct Employee Evaluation Pitfalls

CLO Magazine

Unfortunately, Alan didn’t have data to link the revamped training program to those key sales metrics. Alan experienced the first and perhaps greatest training evaluation pitfall: failing to identify and address evaluation requirements while the program is being designed. Address Evaluation While Designing. They design, develop and deliver a program and only then start to think about how they will evaluate its effectiveness. Kirkpatrick and Wendy K.

How to Measure Online Course Effectiveness

CourseArc

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Approach to Assessing Training Outcomes. In his well-known book Four Levels of Training Evaluation , industry expert Donald Kirkpatrick established a trusted method to help training developers and HR specialists measure the effectiveness of their training initiatives. This level seeks to evaluate whether your learners acquired the information, skills, and knowledge they were expecting to obtain.

What Is Learning Evaluation?

Watershed

Knowing how to aggregate and evaluate all types of learning is a priority for many learning and development practitioners. Technologies are becoming available that enable L&D professionals to aggregate, evaluate, and measure many types of learning data in one place. Key Learning Evaluation Takeaways. So, what is learning evaluation? We'll explain how you can effectively evaluate your learning and development process from design through implementation.

How Employee Performance determines the Success of Your Training Program

eFront

The evaluation process usually involves both the manager and staff in scrutinizing and justifying employee performance metrics together. Also included in these evaluations are the ‘intangibles’ – performance metrics that aren’t based on any quantifiable indicators per se; but rather are observable behaviors and competencies required for an employee to do the job well. Methods of Performance Evaluation for Employees Who Have Gone Through Training Programs.

3 Essential Elements for Evaluating Training Effectiveness

The Learning Dispatch

Here’s guidance on evaluating your workplace training and ensuring training effectiveness. Evaluating Your Workplace Training. And the way to determine whether your class, course, or program is effective is through evaluation. Evaluation tells you whether training is working—whether it’s moving the metrics you need to move, whether it’s making people more proficient at what they need to do. Evaluating training effectiveness is a complex topic.

Kirkpatrick’s Model: How to Calculate eLearning ROI

LearnUpon

Calculating eLearning ROI using Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model. To do this, you’ll need to use Kirkpatrick’s Model of Training Evaluation for the ROI calculation. What is Kirkpatrick’s Model of Training Evaluation? The Kirkpatrick Model was developed in the 1950s by Donald Kirkpatrick, a professor, and training specialist. It evaluates the increase in knowledge and skills, plus changes in behavior.

Watershed's 7 Steps of Learning Evaluation

Watershed

Out of the dozens of different learning evaluation models currently in practice, which one is right for you? Meet our "super method" for learning evaluation. We've been using Watershed Insights to dig into several models of learning evaluation in light of what's possible with modern technologies such as xAPI. Here's an overview of our practical seven-step evaluation process that you can implement in your organization: Step 1: Align learning program evaluation with priorities.

Evaluation and ROI in Compliance Training

Interactive Services

But what about evaluation and return on investment (ROI)? . Evaluation and ROI are important indicators of how well a program is working and how much risk is mitigated. While ROI is an important metric, it shouldn’t be the sole focus of a comprehensive compliance training initiative. When it comes to evaluating and determining the ROI of your compliance initiative, heed the advice of the popular business book written by John Doerr and measure what matters.

Podcast 32: Building a Customer Education Business Case – With Bill Cushard of Learndot

Talented Learning

So now, I don’t have to worry about Kirkpatrick’s 4 levels of employee training evaluation. Instead, I evaluate training with invoices. What do you think are the most important customer education metrics? Here are three key metrics: 1) Enrollments.

Training Evaluation: Why You Can’t Ignore It

Growth Engineering

Yet, there’s more to evaluation than money. A proper evaluation can take a lot of time, and no doubt you’ve got a lot on your plate. But, even when you do have the time – learning evaluation can be a chore. This is partly why 84% of training managers admit they don’t devote enough time to training evaluation. Why do we Neglect Training Evaluation? Evaluations can be mathematical and seemingly uncreative, which might put some people off.

An Overview: Phillips' Model for Learning Evaluation

Watershed

When we originally published our Learning Evaluation eBook and blog series, we covered four learning evaluation models representing a range of approaches and perspectives: Kirkpatrick, Kaufman, Brinkerhoff, and Anderson. While there are many other learning models we’ve yet to cover, the one we’re asked about most often that’s not mentioned in our original series is Phillips' Learning Evaluation Model. Meet the fifth level of learning evaluation.

Do You Know How Successful Your eLearning Program Really Is?

SHIFT eLearning

Here, it is important to mention one key element: evaluation. There are many different approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of an eLearning course, but they all share a common first step: identifying success metrics. Kirkpatrick''s taxonomy is one seasoned model that continues to receive widespread use. Developed by Dr. Don Kirkpatrick in the 1950s, the model originally contained four levels of training evaluation. eLearning books metrics

The LTEM Training & Learning Evaluation Model

Convergence Training

In the discussion below, Dr. Thalheimer explains his LTEM learning evaluation model. Dr. Will Thalheimer Tells Us about His LTEM Learning Evaluation Model. And in the first discussion, we were talking about some commonly used training evaluation models.

3 Ways To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Your Online Training

KnowledgeAnywhere

Consider these 3 ways to evaluate the effectiveness of your online training. At its core, evaluating your training effectiveness is about tracking if employees learn new skills, increase productivity, and grow professionally. One commonly used framework here is the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model , which breaks down the success of any type of training into four levels: Reaction : Based on whether your participants find the training useful, engaging, and relevant.

Is this thing on? Tips for measuring course effectiveness and return on investment

Obsidian Learning

The Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. While later stages of evaluation measure more obvious aspects of quality—such as the impact of the training on the learner—it’s important not to overlook the less obvious factors, such as instructional design or the use of technology. Usability Testing: During course design and prototype development, evaluate the course for usability. Evaluation: The Four Levels. Level 2: Learning Evaluation.

In Defense of the Four Levels

Integrated Learnings

Over the past year or so, I’ve noticed several comments about how Kirkpatrick’s model of four levels of evaluation is outdated. Evaluation was the discussion topic, and several tweets mentioned that the model originated in the 1950s, a lot has changed since then, and we ought to follow a more current model. So it makes perfect sense that we’d evaluate those same things later and report results when we can. Like any model, Kirkpatrick’s four levels has limitations.

Why We Should Stop Talking About ROI in Training

Mindflash

Many people look at Don Kirkpatrick ’s work from as early as 1959 as the beginning of ROI in learning and development. It was in his early work that Kirkpatrick developed his four-level model: Level 1: Reaction. Another model and methodology from Jack Phillips includes a fifth level – ROI – which adds an added financial metric to the mix. In concept, Kirkpatrick’s levels seem valuable. Most evaluations are not asking business-related questions.

ROI 80