Remove Free Remove Harassment Training Remove Rapid eLearning Remove Stock
article thumbnail

How to Create Performance-based E-Learning

Rapid eLearning

E-learning courses generally fall into one of two buckets: tell people something or show them how to do something. The reality is that a lot of e-learning is information-based and mostly driven by compliance requirements. Instead, the course informs about sexual harassment and the organization’s standard.

article thumbnail

What is an E-Learning Course?

Rapid eLearning

What do you think when someone says, “We need to build an e-learning course?” ” An “e-learning course” can mean many things and serve many purposes. It could be simple compliance training or information about policy changes. Sexual harassment training is a good example of this.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why There Are So Many Bad E-Learning Courses

Rapid eLearning

Like many organizations, we have to take compliance training. And when I heard we had a 3-hour harassment course coming, my first emotional response wasn’t positive. Why do I shudder thinking of taking a 3-hour e-learning course? I hear all the time that e-learning courses are boring. We all know why.

article thumbnail

3 Easy Ways to Create Silhouette Characters

Rapid eLearning

Budgets are tight and stock photos cost money. Because of this you end up using the same stock photos over and over again. The stock characters are treated like a team of improv performers. One day they’re all compliant managers and the next day they’re those dreaded sexual harassers from the cubicle down the hall.

article thumbnail

Building Practice & Prove-It Learning Experiences for E-Learning

Rapid eLearning

Much of online training is content that’s created with an e-learning authoring tool and positioned as e-learning courses. However, these courses aren’t necessarily the best at getting people to learn. They’re free to do that, but they’re wrong.