What Are Your Training Metrics Actually Measuring?

Your Training Edge

Much has been written on the subject and many experts have weighed in on what they consider to be the most crucial training metrics ( here are my top 10 ). So, assuming that you are tracking some metrics for your training programs, what are they actually measuring and how can you gain more insight into what’s working and what’s not? Still others have argued for separating behavior metrics from performance metrics, and other modifications. Is your training working?

Metrics for Measuring Training Effectiveness

KnowledgeCity

There is a lot of buzz about metrics when it comes to e-learning, but do you understand what metrics are in relation to your training program? Metrics are quantifiable measures to track, monitor and assess whether your employees have learned and can apply the knowledge acquired through these e-learning opportunities. That’s why it is critical to have metrics in place whenever you provide e-learning opportunities for your workers.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Training metrics you should include in your learning analytics report

Wizcabin

However, that makes it difficult to determine what training metrics are the most essential to be included in your report. In this article, we will talk about the vital training metrics that you should consider in your learning analytics report.

Social Media Metrics

Clark Quinn

I continue to get asked about social learning metrics. Until we get around to a whitepaper or something on metrics, here’re some thoughts: Frankly, the problem with Kirkpatrick (sort of like with LMS’ and ADDIE, *drink*) is not in the concept, but in the execution. Frankly, even activity is a metric. Metrics for informal learning aren’t rocket science, but instead mapping of best principles into specific contexts.

How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision

Dashe & Thomson

I was asked by Wendy Kirkpatrick to remove the copyrighted Kirkpatrick diagrammatic model from my original blog post, How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century. Kirkpatrick’s Revised “Four Levels of Evaluation” model , what we need to do is find out what success looks like in the eyes of these senior managers and stakeholders and let them define their expectations for the training program. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE.

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the Question (or is it?)

Learning Rebels

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the question. Many a person has debated the Kirkpatrick evaluation taxonomy. To name a few: Dan Pontefract: Dear Kirkpatrick’s: You Still Don’t Get It (a personal favorite). Jane Bozarth: Alternatives to Kirkpatrick . Donald Clark: Using Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels to Create and Evaluate Informal and Social Learning Process . Here we go again.

Training Evaluation Beyond Kirkpatrick

Training Industry

Because showing the return on investment from training involves many components and metrics that are not readily measurable, such as the behavioral changes in the learner’s day-to-day work as a result of the training they attended. Today, when we discuss training evaluation, we likely reference Kirkpatrick’s model with the familiar four levels: reaction, learning, behavior and results.

Alternative to the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation

LearnDash

If you have been in the elearning (or training) industry for any amount of time, then you are most likely aware of the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation. For many of us in this industry, it is the go-to methodology for gathering training related metrics and reporting on training success. One could write an entire book on the Kirkpatrick model and the different levels, but I am not going to get into too much detail.

ROI and Metrics in eLearning

Tony Karrer

I'm working on an article around the use of ROI and metrics in eLearning. Kirkpatrick's Level 3: Improving the Evaluation of E-Learning Level 3 evaluations measure whether the there was an actual transfer of learning to the actual work setting. BPM and workflow technologies have been able to achieve significant gains in productivity Metrics Recently, functional managers have begun using eLearning to meet business objectives.

Special Report 2013: Metrics and Measurement

CLO Magazine

Learning evaluation, metrics and measurement are not where they need to be, but some companies have made progress. Learning evaluation, metrics and measurement are not where they need to be, but some companies have made progress. The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. Still, questions remain on how a learning leader should report evaluation metrics to senior leaders

50 Years of the Kirkpatrick Model

Upside Learning

In the fifty years since, his thoughts (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) have gone on to evolve into the legendary Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Evaluation Model and become the basis on which learning & development departments can show the value of training to the business. In November 1959, Donald Kirkpatrick published a series of seminal articles on training evaluation in the ‘Journal of the ASTD’.

Using Metrics That Matter

eLearning Weekly

instructor-led classes and online courses), there are two main types of metrics: transactional data and user data. This is where we get into Kirkpatrick’s levels of evaluation , the Success Case Evaluation Method (PDF) , and other classification systems. When it comes to measuring the impact of training events (ex. Transactional data is all about numbers. For example, it tells you how many people completed a class in a given time period.

MTA: Why the Kirkpatrick Model Works for Us

CLO Magazine

As he settled into his new job, Wiedecker read Jim and Wendy Kirkpatrick’s book, “Training on Trial,” which inspired him to implement the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model at the MTA. The four levels of training evaluation Don Kirkpatrick put forth first in the 1950s are well known to learning leaders. Implementing the Kirkpatrick Model. The methodology to implement the Kirkpatrick Model is straightforward.

How to Evaluate Learning: The Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century

Dashe & Thomson

Even though many Learning and Development organizations find it a challenge to prove training’s effect beyond how learners react to the training and whether they have learned the training content, senior management and business stakeholders are more and more interested in metrics that show the impact on the organization. Then we need to identify specific metrics to demonstrate and deliver on those expectations. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE.

Kirkpatrick’s Model: How to Calculate eLearning ROI

LearnUpon

Calculating eLearning ROI using Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model. To do this, you’ll need to use Kirkpatrick’s Model of Training Evaluation for the ROI calculation. What is Kirkpatrick’s Model of Training Evaluation? The Kirkpatrick Model was developed in the 1950s by Donald Kirkpatrick, a professor, and training specialist. Following the 4 levels of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model, you’ll be able to measure your eLearning ROI.

How Employee Performance determines the Success of Your Training Program

eFront

The evaluation process usually involves both the manager and staff in scrutinizing and justifying employee performance metrics together. Also included in these evaluations are the ‘intangibles’ – performance metrics that aren’t based on any quantifiable indicators per se; but rather are observable behaviors and competencies required for an employee to do the job well. And for the sake of this post, we will stick to the most commonly used methodology – the Kirkpatrick Model.

Do You Know How Successful Your eLearning Program Really Is?

SHIFT eLearning

There are many different approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of an eLearning course, but they all share a common first step: identifying success metrics. Kirkpatrick''s taxonomy is one seasoned model that continues to receive widespread use. Developed by Dr. Don Kirkpatrick in the 1950s, the model originally contained four levels of training evaluation. eLearning books metrics Recently, I attended a Congress of Human Resources.

Podcast 32: Building a Customer Education Business Case – With Bill Cushard of Learndot

Talented Learning

So now, I don’t have to worry about Kirkpatrick’s 4 levels of employee training evaluation. What do you think are the most important customer education metrics? It helps to map metrics to stages in the training management process. Here are three key metrics: 1) Enrollments. Yeah, those are phase two metrics, where you want tie training to an outcome, and you have to define that outcome precisely. Success metrics that matter most – and why.

How to Measure Online Course Effectiveness

CourseArc

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Approach to Assessing Training Outcomes. In his well-known book Four Levels of Training Evaluation , industry expert Donald Kirkpatrick established a trusted method to help training developers and HR specialists measure the effectiveness of their training initiatives. These metrics measure whether, and to what degree, planned organizational outcomes were accomplished as a result of training.

Conducting Post-Course Evaluations

CourseArc

The industry standard Kirkpatrick model measures training based on the four levels of analysis: Level 1: Did the learners enjoy training? Determining the metrics of success before course development is the first step. Ensuring that training is on track with these metrics is extremely important – if training changes scope, it may also change the metrics. Making the return on investment metric a measurable number is the most ideal way to collect data.

Why We Should Stop Talking About ROI in Training

Mindflash

Many people look at Don Kirkpatrick ’s work from as early as 1959 as the beginning of ROI in learning and development. It was in his early work that Kirkpatrick developed his four-level model: Level 1: Reaction. Another model and methodology from Jack Phillips includes a fifth level – ROI – which adds an added financial metric to the mix. In concept, Kirkpatrick’s levels seem valuable. We Don’t Need New Metrics.

ROI 81

Evaluating Social Learning

Dashe & Thomson

There are people looking at applying the Kirkpatrick model, there are people measuring the use of social learning tools, and there are people talking about something similar to Brinkerhoff’s Success Case Method. In the spirit of my blog posts on Re-evaluating Evaluation and Revisiting Kirkpatrick , I decided to start with Don Clark ?Big and his take on using Kirkpatrick’s four levels to create and evaluate social learning.

Measuring Success (ROI) of a Training MOOC, Part 1

Your Training Edge

The first metric to be considered was the number of students completing the courses with passing grades (usually defined as 70 percent or better). Depending how you look at it, this metric leads to either an excellent or a terrible conclusion. The most widely used (at least in theory) method of evaluating training programs is the four-level model developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. Second, decide how each metric will be determined.

ROI 118

It’s Time to Rethink the Value of Training and Development

CLO Magazine

Many rely on the Kirkpatrick Model , which offers four levels of evaluation: Level 1: Reaction – The degree to which employees find the training favorable, engaging and relevant to their jobs. However, using the Kirkpatrick Model to calculate not just the human benefit, but also the financial impact – the ROI – can prove difficult. That data can then be leveraged by correlating with metrics that are monitored anyway, such as performance and potential.

Measuring Success (ROI) of a Training MOOC, Part 2

Your Training Edge

In the previous post, I outlined the four-level model of evaluation developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. Here is where all of the standard metrics—reduced turnover, increased job satisfaction, increased productivity, increased customer satisfaction, and so on—come into play. Remember that in order to achieve valid results, organizations need to decide in advance what metrics are tied to each course as well as how those metrics will be measured—in hard numbers if possible.

ROI 109

Avoid and Correct Employee Evaluation Pitfalls

CLO Magazine

Unfortunately, Alan didn’t have data to link the revamped training program to those key sales metrics. Developing metrics that tie directly to desired business outcomes has been critical to not only our training but to our performance support success as well,” said Joanne S. Follow-up metrics three to six months after the training event reveal the truth about its value. Creating the metrics as you create the training helps ensure you satisfy the targeted program outcomes.”.

In Defense of the Four Levels

Integrated Learnings

Over the past year or so, I’ve noticed several comments about how Kirkpatrick’s model of four levels of evaluation is outdated. Though it’s common to track “butts in seats” and other attendance-related metrics not accounted for in the model, these measures seem more related to staffing and forecasting as opposed to training results. Like any model, Kirkpatrick’s four levels has limitations. Kirkpatrick Evaluation eLearningBy Shelley A. Gable.

More on Re-evaluating Evaluation – Jack Phillips and ROI

Dashe & Thomson

I have been blogging a lot about Training Evaluation this year—mostly Kirkpatrick , but also Brinkerhoff and Scriven. I just realized that I haven’t included a single word about Jack Phillips , who introduced Return on Investment (ROI) as Level 5 to Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation. My first exposure to Phillips’ ROI—although I didn’t realize it at the time—was through a colleague who introduced me to Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels.

Is this thing on? Tips for measuring course effectiveness and return on investment

Obsidian Learning

The Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The most commonly used method of accomplishing this is Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2006) compare it to measuring customer satisfaction and note that when learners are satisfied with training, they are more motivated to learn. The historical support metrics will be analyzed to determine support call trends before and after training. Kirkpatrick, D.

Banishing Evaluation Fears

CLO Magazine

However, there is fear of what might happen if value cannot be shown, so instead of evaluating how training improves performance and contributes to agency mission accomplishment, they select metrics that are easier to demonstrate. There is also reticence to evaluate the degree to which participants apply what they learned in training when they are back on the job, or what we refer to as behavior (level 3) in the Kirkpatrick Model (see figure on p.

Measurement, Meet Management

CLO Magazine

Ever since Don Kirkpatrick’s eponymous learning evaluation model roared out of Wisconsin in the 1950s, learning professionals have been busily standardizing, collecting and analyzing a host of learning outputs from smile sheets and course assessments to behavior change and productivity measures. Fourteen percent have no formal metric reporting in place (Figure 5). One of the most popular management maxims is, “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”

Boost your L&D visibility & credibility – The Annual Learning Report

Learning Wire

Critical remarks have been placed at commonly used models to capture the added value of L&D, as Kirkpatrick’s model. This model (Kirkpatrick, 1998), has served as one of the most popular frameworks for evaluating training programs for the last decades. Overall, research finds that Kirkpatrick, Philips and other models measuring ROI, do not fit contemporary L&D due to a lack of attention for continuous learning. Credible metrics for L&D’s performance.

Report 125

How to Measure the Business Impact of Your Training and Development Programs

EI Design

Typically, at this stage, the metrics that will be used to determine the training effectiveness and impact is established. L&D teams typically look at the following metrics: The number of training registrations and completion rates. Introduction.

Measuring Learning Delivery

CLO Magazine

Most practitioners measure delivery and other aspects of a course using Kirkpatrick’s level 1, typically via a short survey asking about content, delivery and the environment, as well as relevance to the job. Kirkpatrick, who invented the four levels, recommends the survey be administered at the end of the class to get immediate feedback and to ensure a 100 percent response rate. The Business Of Learning learning delivery metrics and measurement

Measuring Training Program ROI

LearnDash

Associating these metrics to key business outcomes allows you to better measure the true impact of a training. At the very least, a robust evaluation system like the Kirkpatrick model should be used. Take the time to create an evaluation strategy using a proven model with relevant metrics and your organization will be in a better position to measure training program ROI.

ROI 153

Maximize the Business Impact of your Learning & Development Strategy

Docebo

The standard response to this discussion has been the Kirkpatrick’s model for evaluating the effectiveness of training. But business leaders care about business outcomes and metrics, not learning outcomes and metrics. Even discussions on return on investment (ROI) doesn’t really concern business leaders, as they see ROI as artificial unless it aligns with tangible business metrics.

Starting from the end

Clark Quinn

Week before last, Will Thalheimer and I had another one of our ‘debates’, this time on the Kirkpatrick model (read the comments, too!). The reason I like the Kirkpatrick model is it emphasizes one thing that I see the industry failing to do. The important point is starting with a business metric. The problems with Kirkpatrick are several. And the impact is what the Kirkpatrick model properly is about, as I opined in the blog debate.