Remove 2013 Remove Adopt Remove Informal Learning Remove Learning Company
article thumbnail

Learning You Can Take to the Bank

CLO Magazine

Furthermore, the Project Management Institute’s report “The Competitive Advantage of Effective Talent Management” from March 2013 discovered that organizations with strong talent management programs met 72 percent of their project goals as compared to 58 percent for organizations with a weaker career development focus.

article thumbnail

Top 11 Disruptive E-Learning Technologies For 2013

Learnnovators

In addition, it offers lot more features opening up the door to a whole lot of possibilities that make learning professionals excited. It allows track informal learning experiences such as playing games and simulations, and also real-world activities (such as visiting web sites, attending conferences, etc.)

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

TOP 11 DISRUPTIVE E-LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES FOR 2013

Learnnovators

It requires an LMS to initiate learning. • It could track only formal learning activities (and not informal learning experiences) • It does not support platform transitions (such as computer to mobile) • It has limitations in sequencing, interoperability, and ensuring security of the learning content.

article thumbnail

JOE GANCI – CRYSTAL BALLING WITH LEARNNOVATORS

Learnnovators

Joseph Ganci is President of eLearningJoe, LLC, a custom learning company located outside Washington. Since 1983, he has been involved in every aspect of multimedia and learning development. In this context, how do you think the existing ‘design model’ of the e-learning authoring tools need to evolve to adapt to these changes?

article thumbnail

Joe Ganci – Crystal Balling with Learnnovators

Learnnovators

Joseph Ganci is President of eLearningJoe, LLC, a custom learning company located outside Washington. Since 1983, he has been involved in every aspect of multimedia and learning development. In this context, how do you think the existing ‘design model’ of the e-learning authoring tools need to evolve to adapt to these changes?