article thumbnail

Measuring The Effectiveness of Your Blended Learning Program

Obsidian Learning

You are likely familiar with Kirkpatrick’s model 1 of the 4 levels of evaluation: The higher you go up the levels, the more time and resources required, but the better the information you obtain. Training evaluation is usually easiest at the lowest level – the measurement of student reactions through simple surveys following a learning event.

article thumbnail

Don't Dump Your L&D in a Downturn: Do These 3 Things Instead

The Training by Nelle Blog | Corporate Training and Consulting

Embrace Evaluation Remember that training you held earlier in the year? What level of evaluation did you administer? If your training evaluation doesn’t go past level one, you’re not alone. percent of respondents) use Level 5 evaluation-return-on-investment for training. 2005, January 15). 2018, July 9).

Metrics 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Hot Topics in Training

Tony Karrer

Last year, I did Hot Topics in Training - A Crude (but mildly interesting) Analysis where I analyzed the topics at Training 2005 and Training 2006 to determine what topics were emerging and fading. As a speaker and someone expected to have a pulse on what's happening, I thought this was mildly interesting.

article thumbnail

Enhancing Educational Strategies: The Role of Data Analytics in Elevating Student Learning Outcomes

Integranxt

Research has shown that using data in instructional decisions can lead to improved student performance (Wayman, 2005; Wayman, Cho, & Johnston, 2007; Wohlstetter, Datnow, & Park, 2008). Identifying Key Metrics: What Data Should Educators Focus On?

article thumbnail

Learning theories

Ed App

Along the same lines, humanist educators believe that learners should be given opportunities to evaluate their own learning, whether that be through formalized self-assessment or descriptive, reflective journaling. 2005) ‘Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age.’ Teaching machines and programmed learning. Washington, D.C: