Learning with e's

NOVEMBER 16, 2012

In my previous blog post, the architecture of learning , I outlined some of the key characteristics of learning in a digital age, and started to identify some of the main differences between Learning 1.0 has seen as shift toward user generated content, and the emergent property of folksonomies. before social media) and Learning 2.0.

Scanning 111

Scanning Learning 2.0 Folksonomy Social Media 111

Jay Cross

NOVEMBER 15, 2009

Andrew McAfee , Principal Research Scientist , Center for Digital Business – MIT Sloan School of Management and Author, Enterprise 2.0. What might a PKM program in your organization look like, and how can it leverage social networking tools? I can’t tell where one stops and the other begins. Today, Enterprise 2.0

KM 38

KM Social Networks Authoring Tools Case Study 38

Experiencing eLearning

NOVEMBER 19, 2009

The need and pressure to learn continually, coupled with limited time available to learn, make new digital media viable for professional development. Let’s discuss how microlearning might address the realities of learning in a digital age. Microcontent is little bits of digital information in a permanent state of flux and circulation.

LearnTrends 262

LearnTrends microlearning Learning Objects PLE 262

Learning with e's

JUNE 4, 2009

I responded (as you do) with my own version: "A folksonomist: one who organises information in ways that make sense to his/her own community of practice or interest." There always has to be some organisation at an individual level, or there would be no folksonomy at the community level - all would remain chaotic.

Folksonomy 40

Folksonomy Taxonomy Delicious Social Networks 40