IEEE LTSC xAPI TAG A-OK

Experience API

Shelly Blake-Plock announced last night via LinkedIn that he would be leading a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for IEEE LTSC (Learning Technologies Standards Committee). In his own words, Shelly describes the work in this way: Our initial purpose is to create an IEEE technical report as a reference and implementation guide for xAPI 1.0.3. IEEE stamping xAPI would encourage adoption, particularly outside of the US.

xAPI’s Tipping Point for Both Community & Industry

MakingBetter

Since last year, I worked with IEEE to standardize the Experience API (xAPI) specification. Most of my work is with the IEEE-LTSC but recently a few other IEEE standards groups expressed interest in using xAPI. ” First, a small team will draft a Project Authorization Request for IEEE-LTSC. The team will submit this PAR in February for March evaluation by the IEEE New Standards Committee (NESCOM).

xapi 158

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mea culpa

Experience API

To be honest, I am struggling to discern which pieces of work would best support the xAPI community and Rustici Software. There’s good work happening at the IEEE LTSC TAG xAPI , and we’re doing a bit of it. I’m sorry. My bad. Mea culpa. I wrote this all the way back in September, and I told you I’d follow it up with a further post one week later. It’s now eleven weeks and one day later and I still don’t have an answer for you.

Standard Options Apply

MakingBetter

In August, 2014 I participated in one of the IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC) monthly meetings. Once the request is made and approved by IEEE’s New Standards Committee, we begin the last leg of a journey that started with friends riding roller coasters in Cedar Point amusement park in Sandusky, OH back in 2009. The PAR wasn’t approved by the LTSC in that August meeting. IEEE LTSC is the appropriate place to figure out the timetables.

AICC and SCORM Compliance: The Benefits for Your e-Learning

Trivantis

That’s a bit like what was happening in the e-Learning community before SCORM was established. The lab combined the work of existing standards organizations like the AICC , IMS and the IEEE LTSC into a cohesive reference model.

AICC 72

Q&A - eLearning Standards Especially SCORM

Tony Karrer

There are a bunch of other standards by ADL (who is responsible for SCORM ), IMS , IEEE LTSC including CORDRAâ„¢ , LOM , Meta-data , etc. Note: ARIADNE, AICC, IEEE LTSC, and IMS all participate in ADL's work on SCORM). This does not appear to be a new posting, but one that I recently found for the ToolBook community, but it is relevant for all.