Dashe & Thomson

APRIL 17, 2011

I have included Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation in every proposal I have ever written, and I wanted to hear from Kirkpatrick himself regarding his take on the current state of evaluation and whether his four levels are still viable. Well, based on where Kirkpatrick and his son James are today, I was completely wrong.

Kirkpatrick 168

Kirkpatrick Social Learning Social Networks Blogging 168

Obsidian Learning

DECEMBER 3, 2018

These metrics are helpful for making the case for learning, but are insufficient to argue for the value of learning to the organization. Your metrics will be tied to your learning objectives. Sometimes, the goal of training is the attitude change. Learning does not necessarily equal improved performance. Level 4: Results.

Blended Learning 73

Blended Learning Blended Program Effectiveness 73

Obsidian Learning

OCTOBER 30, 2015

The Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2006) compare it to measuring customer satisfaction and note that when learners are satisfied with training, they are more motivated to learn. Determination of Return On Investment , or ROI. Quality Control (QC).

Kirkpatrick 40

Kirkpatrick Effectiveness Course Evalution 40

CLO Magazine

AUGUST 24, 2013

The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. The framework for learning evaluation and measurement embraced by most in the industry starts with Kirkpatrick. The most important indicator of value, Kirkpatrick said, is return on expectations, or ROE.

Phillips 65

Phillips Kirkpatrick Ratio ROI 65