article thumbnail

What happened in 2023 and what’s next for eLearning standards

Rustici Software

We were shocked to see how many people joined Chris Tompkins and Brian Miller on “Our IEEE LTSC voting members recap 2023 and what’s next for the standards” webinar last week. The Rustici Software team regularly contributes to the evolution of the standards through involvement with the IEEE, ADL and 1EdTech eLearning standards groups.

article thumbnail

AICC and SCORM Compliance: The Benefits for Your e-Learning

Trivantis

In the late 1990s, each learning management system had its own proprietary content format, which encouraged vendor lock-in. You had to use that vendor’s tools to create e-Learning that worked with that LMS, or your content wouldn’t play. Uploading content to an LMS using AICC is typically a multiple step process.

AICC 63
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

What vendors can do to prepare for xAPI 2.0

Experience API

cmi5, which is the most recommended approach for handling LMS-based, single learner content, is now on a standardization track, but it’s currently limited to using the 1.0.x The cmi5 working group is moving the specification toward becoming an IEEE standard that will reference xAPI 2.0 x lines for years (decades).

xapi 52
article thumbnail

Q&A - eLearning Standards Especially SCORM

Tony Karrer

Most of the time, it's to handle cross-domain issues, i.e., learning content is on different server than learning management. There are a bunch of other standards by ADL (who is responsible for SCORM ), IMS , IEEE LTSC including CORDRAâ„¢ , LOM , Meta-data , etc. Do you plan to reuse parts of the content in future courses?

IEEE LTSC 101