Learning with e's

NOVEMBER 16, 2012

In the summary of the article, I suggested that the distinct differences between the two types of learning are mostly based on how learners are changing the ways they interact, and their increased ability to create, share and organise their own learning. Social media have provided the tools to achieve this on a global level.

Scanning 111

Scanning Learning 2.0 Folksonomy Social Media 111

Learning with e's

FEBRUARY 5, 2011

image, sound, and video) to provide students with a better understanding of concepts under study. collaborative tagging, social networking, mash-ups, and wikis), lightweight representation of semantics and metadata is used in the form of folksonomies, user comments, and ratings. Due to the intensive use of Web 2.0 techniques (e.g.

Technology 79

Technology Folksonomy Learning Objects Social Networks 79

Experiencing eLearning

NOVEMBER 19, 2009

folksonomy rather than standardization. Moderator (Janet Clarey): “…emancipation-through-technology underplays the dependence of these activities on on carriers, providers, division managers, infrastructures, and more. No repository (unless you view the whole web as a repository). Not dependent on time or place.

LearnTrends 262

LearnTrends microlearning Learning Objects PLE 262