Remove 2000 Remove Informal Remove Player Remove vendor
article thumbnail

The ongoing work of learning standards

Litmos

After initial efforts in 1993, and bursts of energy circa 2000 and again in 2004, we’re seeing a new resurgence of activity and interest. You could use any of the many authoring tools, such as Authorware, but you needed an appropriate player. Vendors got on board, and SCORM became a more-or-less viable mechanism.

article thumbnail

History of the LMS

eLearning 24-7

CBT Prior to online learning known then as WBT, and then the latter term of e-learning (vendors today, use it to refer to content that is online), there was CBT. Prior to the whole online scene, you could access information via FTP sites known as Archie, Veronica and Jughead (yes, totally true. Informal was there. I used them).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

2022 Turkey Awards

eLearning 24-7

Oh, and not the first vendor I’ve seen this route, but that was more than a decade ago. There are vendors who pitch they have it, and there are folks who oversee L&D who still believe in it. And in 2002, many more – I used Geolearning – it offered lots of informal options. Others are big fans of it.

article thumbnail

The Latest – Learning System RFI Template

eLearning 24-7

Let’s face it – RFI/RFP documents sent over to learning system vendors are massive tomes that confuse, challenge and even baffle some vendors. Thus, two options – Go full throttle (the one I always use – for my award considerations, or assess a vendor – analysis-wise) or streamline!

article thumbnail

The LMS – Let’s Set The Record Straight

eLearning 24-7

Naysayers continue to pontificate on information that is just wrong. The dominant player in each of those shows was an LMS, followed by a learning platform. In my upcoming NexGen Leader Pack (coming in late July), the majority are LMS vendors. My LMS did, back in 2000. It was that way even back in 2000. LMS vendor.

article thumbnail

Hits and Misses in 2022 – Learning Systems Edition

eLearning 24-7

Some are truly the “score”, that will go forward in 2023, to I believe not just imitators, in one case, and I would be one who would follow suit, then there are “scores” which bounced off the crossbar or off another player and went in. What about other vendors? The vendor, doesn’t have to do it.

article thumbnail

Reader’s Mailbag – You Ask, I Answer

eLearning 24-7

On top of that, there are vendors out there who change the type of system, repetitively. One vendor called their system for the longest time a “micro-learning platform” Now? Another vendor calls their system nearly every keyword for SEO purposes (you can see it on their web site). They call it something else.

vendor 71