article thumbnail

SCORM Vs. xAPI (Tin Can): eLearning Content Standards

Academy of Mine

Both SCORM and xAPI are content standards used to create eLearning courses. Tin Can, otherwise known as xAPI, was developed in 2013 (over a decade after SCORM was released). So, in this article, we’re going to talk about some differences between the two standards. After all, what’s the difference between SCORM and xAPI?

xapi 52
article thumbnail

SCORM, AICC, xAPI – Which one do I need?

eLearning 24-7

At the end of the post, there are additional articles that I strongly recommend reading. vs SCORM 2004 as it was newer. for a couple of years, and then a major new initiative resulted in SCORM 2004 1st edition, 2nd, 3rd, and finally 4th (it never took off in the industry, which is why if a vendor offers it, they use the 3rd edition ).

AICC 69
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SCORM Vs. xAPI (Tin Can): eLearning Content Standards

Academy of Mine

Both SCORM and xAPI are content standards used to create eLearning courses. Otherwise known as Tin Can — xAPI was developed in 2013 — over a decade after SCORM was released. Contrary to what developers of xAPI thought would happen, the eLearning protocol didn’t gain much traction when it was released. SCORM Vs. xAPI.

xapi 52
article thumbnail

SCORM 1.2 vs SCORM 2004 – which is better?

Paradiso

or SCORM 2004 – which makes more sense for you? and SCORM 2004 still enjoy better support as a way of ensuring standardized communication between online courses and their corresponding Learning Management System. lacks many of the features of the more modern specifications, like SCORM 2004. Related articles across the web.

SCORM 70
article thumbnail

SCORM 1.2 vs SCORM 2004 – which is better?

Paradiso

or SCORM 2004 – which makes more sense for you? and SCORM 2004 still enjoy better support as a way of ensuring standardized communication between online courses and their corresponding Learning Management System. lacks many of the features of the more modern specifications, like SCORM 2004. Related articles across the web.

SCORM 70
article thumbnail

The ongoing work of learning standards

Litmos

After initial efforts in 1993, and bursts of energy circa 2000 and again in 2004, we’re seeing a new resurgence of activity and interest. SCORM was updated in 2004, and that is the existing standard for course delivery. ADL decided to create a new standard, the Experience API (xAPI; originally known as Tin Can). And now you can.

article thumbnail

Publishing an xAPI (Tin Can) Course in Adobe Captivate 2019

LearnUpon

We love xAPI. Even if you don’t have the opportunity to take advantage of the wider functionality that xAPI provides, it’s a better, more stable standard to use than SCORM. Republishing your SCORM content in xAPI is a prudent move to reduce problems that can happen with the older standard. SCORM 2004, AICC, and Tin Can.