article thumbnail

SCORM Vs. xAPI (Tin Can): eLearning Content Standards

Academy of Mine

Fast forward to 2013 and xAPI was released as a more advanced version of SCORM — the main difference is that you can track learning outside of the LMS and offline. You can look at a lot of big LMS providers, and you will see that they don’t support xAPI since the demand isn’t high. As a reference, Academy Of Mine LMS supports SCORM 1.2

xapi 52
article thumbnail

Adapting to change: Going hybrid and supporting standards

Rustici Software

We’ve seen people move to other parts of the country, and we’ve tackled the challenge of hiring, onboarding and supporting fully remote employees. The same holds true for the standards that we support and the ever changing needs of our customers. The list of acronyms that our products support continues to grow. Is it worth it?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Reporting eLearning Results

The Logical Blog by IconLogic

There are two primary versions of SCORM-version 1.2, released in 1999, and version 2004. " If the Tin Can API is supported by your LMS, you'll be happy to learn that it's also fully supported in most of today's eLearning development tools.

Report 100
article thumbnail

SCORM, AICC, xAPI – Which one do I need?

eLearning 24-7

vs SCORM 2004 as it was newer. for a couple of years, and then a major new initiative resulted in SCORM 2004 1st edition, 2nd, 3rd, and finally 4th (it never took off in the industry, which is why if a vendor offers it, they use the 3rd edition ). and SCORM 2004 3 rd edition. Well, the opposite is true. quickly became 1.1

AICC 69
article thumbnail

Raptivity Classic vs. Raptivity 2020 Comparison

Raptivity

Raptivity Suite version 7.8 Latest OS support (Windows 8 and Windows 10) . Yes, supported. Yes, supported. . Mobile support. It is SCORM 2004, SCORM 1.2, It is SCORM 2004, SCORM 1.2, It is SCORM 2004, SCORM 1.2, This is the current latest version and works on Windows 10 and the latest browsers.

Raptivity 130
article thumbnail

Why SCORM 2004 failed & what that means for Tin Can

eFront

“SCORM 2004 is dying (if not already dead!).” For the careful observer there are many signs to support this view, and here are a few of them: Sign #1: 75% of packages are still on SCORM 1.2, 10 years after the initial release of SCORM 2004 [1] [2]. Sign #3: ADL itself heavily supports Tin Can as the successor of SCORM.[4].

SCORM 105
article thumbnail

“What is the right learning standard to support in my application?”

Rustici Software

The requests are mounting so much that my team needs to consider adding support. I don’t want to spend all my developer hours building one standard just to fall down the rabbit hole of needing to support several. Then there are three versions of SCORM 2004 (2nd, 3rd and 4th Editions). Can your team help with this?