Trending Sources

How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision

Social Learning

I was asked by Wendy Kirkpatrick to remove the copyrighted Kirkpatrick diagrammatic model from my original blog post, How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century. The post How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision appeared first on Social Learning Blog. think the table actually makes the process easier to understand.

How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century—A Revision

Social Learning

I was asked by Wendy Kirkpatrick to remove the copyrighted Kirkpatrick diagrammatic model from my original blog post, How to Evaluate Learning: Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century. Kirkpatrick’s revision of the Four Levels starts with defining what the results, or return on expectations should be. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE. Level 2.

MTA: Why the Kirkpatrick Model Works for Us

CLO Magazine

As he settled into his new job, Wiedecker read Jim and Wendy Kirkpatrick’s book, “Training on Trial,” which inspired him to implement the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model at the MTA. The four levels of training evaluation Don Kirkpatrick put forth first in the 1950s are well known to learning leaders. Implementing the Kirkpatrick Model. Pay Close Attention.

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the Question (or is it?)

Learning Rebels

To “Kirkpatrick” or not to “Kirkpatrick”, that is the question. Many a person has debated the Kirkpatrick evaluation taxonomy. To name a few: Dan Pontefract: Dear Kirkpatrick’s: You Still Don’t Get It (a personal favorite). Jane Bozarth: Alternatives to Kirkpatrick . Here we go again. To be, or not to be, that is the question—.

Kirkpatrick Revisited | Social Learning Blog

Social Learning

It was an opportunity I couldn’t miss.  I have included Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation in every proposal I have ever written, and I wanted to hear from Kirkpatrick himself regarding his take on the current state of evaluation and whether his four levels are still viable. Well, based on where Kirkpatrick and his son James are today, I was completely wrong. training?to

The Kirkpatrick-Phillips Model – Part 4

CommLab India

In the third part of this series, we looked at the advantages and disadvantages of the Kirkpatrick Model of Evaluating a training program. mentioned the Kirkpatrick-Phillips Model of Evaluation in passing, and promised you more on this “ evolved ” model. Kirkpatrick Model. Related Posts Is Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluating a Training Program The Best? Here goes. Level.

Donald Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training: Lessons from a Legend

Origin Learning

Kirkpatrick ,  Professor Emeritus, University Of Wisconsin first gave his ideas for a  series of articles to be published in the Journal of American Society of Training Directors in the year 1959, hardly had anyone anticipated that this was to be the stuff of legend. When Donald L. Here  is what the model basically measures and how: Reaction. Learning. Behaviour. Results.

Vale Don Kirkpatrick

Clark Quinn

Last week, Don Kirkpatrick passed away. Kirkpatrick rode this tool for the rest of his career,  created a family business in it, and he wasn’t shy about suggesting that you buy a book to learn about it.  I certainly can’t fault him for it either, as he did have a sensible model and it could be put into effective use. Still, Kirkpatrick could’ve renumbered the steps, or been more outspoken about the problems with just step 1. Known for his four ‘ levels ‘ of measuring learning, he’s been hailed and excoriated. That’s  not  the idea!

Evaluating ELearning ROI with Kirkpatrick


Using The Kirkpatrick Model. One of the more well known ways to measure elearning and training initiatives is with the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The point here is that Kirkpatrick emphasizes five different evaluation methods. Most business make decisions based on how it will impact their bottom-line. Businesses that do this well stay in business. Plain and simple.

Donald L. Kirkpatrick, 1924 - 2014

The Peformance Improvement

Kirkpatrick died. It seems like every training, HRD, and HPI manager knows the Kirkpatrick Model even if they don’t know the name of the model or who invented the four levels. However, this criticism doesn’t diminish my admiration for Kirkpatrick. We all owe much to the contribution Donald Kirkpatrick made to employee learning and organizational improvement. Kirkpatric

Alternative to the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation


If you have been in the elearning (or training) industry for any amount of time, then you are most likely aware of the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation. One could write an entire book on the Kirkpatrick model and the different levels, but I am not going to get into too much detail. This core of this model is actually based on the Kirkpatrick approach.

Evaluating Training with Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model

Designing Digitally

Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model is an excellent model to help analyze the impact of training on the organization.  . Donald Kirkpatrick , Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, first published the Four-Level Training Evaluation Model in 1959. We enjoy using the Kirkpatrick model to create engaging, educational, and entertaining learning experiences. 

A tribute to Dr Donald Kirkpatrick, pioneer and veteran of Instructional Design

Origin Learning

Dr. Donald Kirkpatrick is one of those few people that have achieved eternity by virtue of their contribution. professor emeritus at University of Wisconsin and the creator of the Kirkpatrick Four-level Evaluation Model , Dr. Kirkpatrick passed away on May 9, 2014 at the age of 90. He recently reflected on his legacy in a thought-provoking post on the Kirkpatrick Partners blog.

Is It Time To Kill the Kirkpatrick Model?


The Kirkpatrick Model for training evaluation is kind of like Old Faithful. Here is the model as described by the Kirkpatrick Partners: But is the Kirkpatrick Model still valid? However, not everyone hates the Kirkpatrick Model. To Kirkpatrick or not to Kirkpatrick is not a new controversy. The post Is It Time To Kill the Kirkpatrick Model?

Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation: A Critique

The Peformance Improvement

At the end of Dan McCarthy’s blog post , “How to Evaluate a Training Program”, in which he explains his pre-post, survey approach to applying the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation , he asks: Has anyone used a system like this, or something better? This takes nothing away from the contribution that the Kirkpatrick model has made to the field over the past 50 years.

How to Evaluate Learning: The Kirkpatrick Model for the 21st Century

Social Learning

Kirkpatrick’s revised “Four Levels of Evaluation” model, what we need to do is find out what success looks like in the eyes of these senior managers and stakeholders and let them define their expectations for the training program. Kirkpatrick calls this Return on Expectations, or ROE. According to Donald L. Level 2. Level 3. Level 4. Results). Behavior). Learning).

Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluation – the Very Basics of the Model: Part 2

CommLab India

According to Dr. Don Kirkpatrick, there are three reasons to evaluate a training program: To know how to improve future training programs. In my previous blog, I presented a brief introduction to the Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluation and its impact on training 1. According to Dr. Don Kirkpatrick, there are four levels of evaluation of any training program. Values. Growth.

Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluation – Making Maximum Use of Evaluation: Part 1

CommLab India

Kirkpatrick’s Model of Learning Evaluation. Of these four models of evaluation, the most successful one is the Kirkpatrick’s Model of Learning Evaluation (In fact, the Anderson’s Value of Learning Model is based on Kirkpatrick’s Model of Learning Evaluation). Brief Introduction to the Kirkpatrick’s Model of Learning Evaluation. Level 2: Learning.

Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation


It was while writing his thesis in 1952 that Donald Kirkpatrick became interested in evaluating training programs. The four-level model developed by Kirkpatrick is now universally used in gauging training effectiveness. Since Kirkpatrick stated his original model, other theorists like Jack Phillips, have referred to a fifth level, namely, Return On Investment (ROI).



Traynor Beverly Traynor Brinkerhoff Community of Practice Donald Kirkpatrick e-learning eLearning Guild Master Award eLearning Solutions on a Shoestring Empathy Map Etienne Wenger Flipchart Geometric Close HR Jane Bozarth Khan Academy Kirkpatrick’s Taxonomy L&D Learning Solutions Magazine Learnnovators M. Custom E-Learning E-Learning Interviews Learning Consulting WOL #lrnchat B.

Kirkpatrick's Revised Four Level Evaluation Model

Big Dog, Little Dog

I had an interesting discussion with Clark Quinn on using Kirkpatrick's model in learning processes other than courses. Clark argues that use of Kirkpatrick’s model is only for courses because training is the dominant discussion on their web site. So after some heavy reflection I did a rewrite on my Kirkpatrick web page and have listed some of the highlights below.

Using Your LCMS to Save Kirkpatrick


Forget about this Kirkpatrick level four,” he said. “It’s too hard […]. Forget About Level 4? Never! Not too many years ago I remember the words of an L&D VP to whom I reported. We were talking about measuring the effectiveness of a very expensive training program we just delivered. Just focus on the first three. Learning


Is Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluating a Training Program The Best? – Part 3

CommLab India

This is the third blog in the Kirkpatrick Model of Instruction series. In the first part of the series, I covered the need to evaluate any training program and the basics of the Kirkpatrick model of evaluating a training program. In the second part of this series, I delved into each level of the Kirkpatrick model. Managers must take charge of evaluation at this level. Money.

In Memoriam: Dr. Donald Kirkpatrick by Bill Brandon

Learning Solutions Magazine

Donald Kirkpatrick, professor emeritus, University of Wisconsin, and creator of the Kirkpatrick. Four-level Evaluation Model, passed away May 9, 2014 at the age of 90. We remember his life and. his contributions to the field of workplace learning. Instructional Design Management Measurement Professional Development

Ongoing Evaluation


apply Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation to your course design. identify the relationship between needs analysis and Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation. Instructional Design Online Learning alpha testing beta testing evaluation Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation pilot testing reliable assessments roi valid assessmentsIn this module we will.

More on evaluating NFL using Kirkpatrick’s Four-level model

The E-Learning Curve

I’m going to begin this post by mentioning Donald Clark’s view on Donald Kirkpatrick’s model – the post has the tongue-in-cheek title Donald Talks Bollocks, and it gives an alternative view on the four levels; have a read, it’s good stuff. However, as Mr. Clark points out, rejecting Kirkpatrick doesn’t provide a answer to how […] More on evaluating NFL using Kirkpatrick’s Four-level model is a post from: E-Learning Curve Blog. learning 4-level model Kirkpatrick non-formal learning training evaluation model

Evaluating Informal Learning

Social Learning

She knows that I have been blogging about learning evaluation for the past couple of years—mostly Kirkpatrick but also [.] Carliner Evaluation formal learning Informal Learning Kirkpatrick non-formal learning social learning The post Evaluating Informal Learning appeared first on Social Learning Blog.

Top 5 Performance Support Apps for Learning Designers


Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model’ App. The Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model app is another support app from Orion Beadling that is designed to act as a convenient job aid to reference the core elements of Kirkpatrick’s Model of Evaluation. THE QUOTE: “ Instructional Design is complex and overlaps with many fields. DesignJot’ App. Kineo E-Learning Top Tips’ App. 309.95.

Flipping Kirkpatrick

Big Dog, Little Dog

Donald Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Evaluation was introduced in the late fifties: Reaction - how the learners react to the learning process Learning - the extent to which the learners gain knowledge and skills Performance (behavior) - capability to perform the learned skills while on the job Results (impact) - includes such items as monetary, efficiency, moral, etc. flip it upside-down!

The Learning Alliance and the Four Levels of Training Evaluation

The Peformance Improvement

In response to my blog post titled, “Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation: A Critique” , Wendy Kirkpatrick wrote a comment directing me to a white paper that she co-authored with Jim Kirkpatrick, "The Kirkpatrick Four Levels: A Fresh Look After 50 Years 1959 - 2009." That document describes updated thinking that the Kirkpatrick’s call “The Kirkpatrick Model”.

Is this thing on? Tips for measuring course effectiveness and return on investment

Obsidian Learning

The Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The most commonly used method of accomplishing this is Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2006) compare it to measuring customer satisfaction and note that when learners are satisfied with training, they are more motivated to learn. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D.

Beyond Kirkpatrick

Allison Rossett

Tweet Recorded class session from San Diego State University. Click thumbnail to view video. Media Videos Analysis

Measuring Training Effectiveness Through Gaming

Social Learning

Evaluation Gaming Theory evaluation feedback gaming Kirkpatrick user adoptionA very common question that Instructional Designers field from clients goes something like this: “The training plan looks great; now how will I be able to tell if it has an impact?” While this is a perfectly natural question – after all, why else would one buy training – it can be a particularly difficult [.]

Measuring Training Effectiveness Through Gaming

Social Learning

For instance, the vaunted Kirkpatrick model (covered with great erudition in a series of posts by my colleague, Barbara Camm), which has been the gold standard of project assessment for over fifty years, requires a good deal of time to implement correctly across all four levels – the kind of time that rarely seems to exist in real-world corporate training. here ).