Clive on Learning

article thumbnail

Over-engineered for information transfer, under-engineered for learning

Clive on Learning

We over-engineer for information transfer and we under-engineer for learning. Don't over-engineer, don't under-engineer. After all, we've been doing this for at least 30 years now under various guises. We should know what we're doing. There seem to be two problems. Let's take the first. Get the balance right.

article thumbnail

What does it take to be a good e-learning designer?

Clive on Learning

An ability to empathise with their audience: this is a critical ''teaching'' quality and sometimes lacking in those who view e-learning as an engineering discipline. Someone who is enthusiastic about technology and certainly not afraid of it: this is not the same as being seriously technical.

Design 109
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Market failure? Blame it on the dog food

Clive on Learning

But hold on, because I think I've figured it out. Let's make a comparison. A great deal of work goes into the production values of video games, particularly the big, 3D action games, and yet the ultimate success of games is actually determined by game play.

Market 72
article thumbnail

Gender equality and the design dilemma

Clive on Learning

You want to show senior managers in an engineering company discussing a business strategy. Your concern is that, if you major on gender equality, showing women in positions that they rarely occupy in real life, but which they are perfectly capable of performing, then your content loses credibility. You might turn off some of your audience.

Design 59
article thumbnail

In case you missed it – 2011 in posts

Clive on Learning

November Profile of a learning architect: Darren Owen Shepherd accused of sensationalist claptrap Beware who's selling informal learning * Blending is a continuum Want to write? Get on a train Why does learning content seem so much more exciting on an iPad?

article thumbnail

Design for learning – what’s in a name?

Clive on Learning

If you’re not a child of the sixties, you could swap out designer for architect, perhaps even engineer. I would go with this one if it wasn’t for the inevitable acronym – let’s face it, LSD is not ideal. Each term has slightly different implications in terms of how you go about your job and how others perceive you.

Design 49
article thumbnail

Three paths to personalised learning

Clive on Learning

No, we don’t have access to the armies of software engineers that support such high-profile products, but we could do so much more with the tools already at our disposal. Give your computer a treat – ask it to do something a little more demanding than shuffle slides or play videos.